Further try in UPSC exam-2020 to have cascading impact, govt tells SC

UPSC exam-2020, UPSC exam-2020 Latest news, upsc, upsc extra attempt, upsc,


UPSC exam-2020, UPSC exam-2020 Latest news, upsc, upsc extra attempt, upsc,
Picture Supply : PTI/FILE

Further try in UPSC exam-2020 to have cascading impact, govt tells SC

The Centre instructed the Supreme Court docket on Monday that permitting additional try in UPSC civil companies examination to those that couldn’t seem of their final probability in 2020 as a result of COVID-19 state of affairs would create a “cascading impact”, detrimental to the general functioning and stage taking part in discipline crucial for a public examination system. In an affidavit filed within the apex court docket, the Centre has stated that giving an extra try or leisure in age for some candidates would quantity to extending differential remedy to equally positioned aspirants on the examination.

 

The affidavit was filed days after the Centre had instructed the highest court docket that it was not in favour of granting yet another alternative to civil companies aspirants who couldn’t seem of their final try in 2020.

 

“Due to this fact, any reduction to the petitioner, other than being meritless, would additionally end result severely prejudicing different candidates sooner or later.

 

“It’s subsequently respectfully submitted that accommodating the current petitioners would create a cascading impact detrimental to the general functioning and stage taking part in discipline essential to be offered in any public examination system,” stated the affidavit, filed by an below secretary within the Division of Personnel and Coaching.

 

The highest court docket which is listening to a plea in search of grant of yet another probability to seem in the us’s civil companies examination to these aspirants who couldn’t seem of their final try in 2020 as a result of pandemic.

 

The matter was listed on Monday earlier than a bench headed by Justice A M Khanwilkar, which posted it for listening to on January 28.

 

“We’re knowledgeable by Further Solicitor Basic that the reply affidavit has already been filed. Registry to establish that place and flow into a duplicate of the reply. The petitioners are permitted to file rejoinder thereto by January 27, 2021 by means of e-mail. Events are free to file written be aware of submissions by January 27, 2021. Checklist these issues on January 28,” the bench, additionally comprising Justices B R Gavai and Krishna Murari, stated in its order.

 

In its affidavit filed within the prime court docket, the Centre has stated, “It could be famous that offering an additional try might additional have a cascading impact by making a floor for problem on a part of these candidates who’ve already appeared for the CS (Preliminary) Examination-2020.”

 

“On the outset, it’s curious to notice that the petitioners, who participated within the examination with open eyes, solely approached this court docket after the outcomes of the examination was declared. Be that as it might, it’s submitted the us made all the required preparations for the conduct of CS (Preliminary) Examination-2020 on October 4, 2020, in a secure and environment friendly method adhering to all of the COVID-19 security protocols issued by the Authorities of India sometimes,” it stated.

 

It stated the us had given an choice to aspirants to alter their centre for the examination to cater to candidates who would have moved to a unique location owing to the pandemic

 

It stated a complete of 4,86,952 candidates appeared within the October Four final 12 months examination and the us had “left no stone unturned of their pursuit to accommodate for the means and pursuits of the candidates.”

 

“It’s additional submitted that the rivalry by the petitioners that their preparation was hampered as a result of stress brought on by the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic, doesn’t maintain weight as the us had already given additional time to the candidates by suspending the CS (preliminary) examination-2020 from Might 31, 2020 to October 4, 2020,” it stated, including that these situations would have affected each candidate on the examination in an analogous method.

 

“It’s additional submitted that giving an extra try or leisure in age for some candidates would quantity to extending differential remedy to equally positioned candidates on the examination,” it stated.

 

The affidavit stated that different non-final try candidates, who undertook the examination “with none murmur of discontent”, could be disadvantageously positioned in future examinations if the reduction prayed for by the petitioners is granted as it could allow huge variety of skilled candidates to take part once more, thereby making the longer term examination excessively aggressive.

 

“It’s submitted that such different non-final try candidates would subsequently have a authentic grievance in opposition to such participation as their possibilities to be chosen in such future examination could be severely jeopardized,” it stated.

 

“It’s submitted that as indicated above, other than having a cascading impact, the identical will lead un-levelling of the taking part in discipline for the potential candidates that too after the petitioner have participated within the course of willingly,” it stated.

 

The Centre stated that in October final 12 months, fifth part of Unlock was in impact, leading to removing of a lot of the restrictions with respect to motion of public.

 

The highest court docket on September 30 final 12 months had refused to postpone the us civil companies preliminary examination, which was held on October 4, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and floods in a number of components of the nation.

 

Nonetheless, it had directed the central authorities and the Union Public Service Fee to contemplate granting an additional probability to candidates who in any other case have their final try in 2020, with corresponding extension of the higher age-limit.

 

The bench was then instructed {that a} formal resolution could be taken by the Division of Personnel and Coaching solely. 

Latest Education News





Source link