AUSTIN, Texas — The Texas Courtroom of Legal Appeals on Thursday denied a movement to postpone the execution of a prisoner scheduled to be killed subsequent month for the homicide of a comfort retailer employee.
The rejection was the newest twist in the tumultuous case of John Henry Ramirez, who received notoriety when he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Courtroom — to not spare his life, however to permit his pastor to put arms on him and pray within the execution chamber. Mr. Ramirez received that enchantment, and his execution date was set for Oct. 5.
However then got here a reversal unrelated to Mr. Ramirez’s non secular freedom case: The district lawyer of Nueces County, Mark Gonzalez, filed a movement withdrawing his workplace’s request for a loss of life warrant, citing his “agency perception that the loss of life penalty is unethical.”
The withdrawal would more than likely have postponed Mr. Ramirez’s execution till a minimum of 2024, when Mr. Gonzalez’s time period expires.
Mr. Gonzalez’s movement landed on the desk of Choose Bobby Galvan, who presided over Mr. Ramirez’s unique trial and set his execution date. At a listening to in June, Choose Galvan denied Mr. Gonzalez’s request to withdraw the execution warrant, saying he didn’t imagine he had that authority as a decide. Thursday’s determination from the Courtroom of Legal Appeals affirmed Choose Galvan’s ruling.
Mr. Gonzalez didn’t reply to a request for touch upon Thursday night.
Mr. Ramirez was convicted in 2008 of repeatedly stabbing a comfort retailer employee named Pablo Castro in the middle of a theft. Mr. Ramirez and two buddies had been driving round Corpus Christi on the lookout for somebody to rob for drug cash after they encountered Mr. Castro, a father of 9. Prosecutors say the theft netted them $1.25.
Mr. Ramirez’s guilt will not be in query. He admitted to the homicide at his trial.
Requested to submit any mitigating circumstances at his sentencing, he provided a Bible verse, Psalm 51:3: “For I acknowledge my transgressions and my sin is ever earlier than me.”
4 of Mr. Castro’s kids filed a quick this 12 months asking the courtroom to retain the October execution date and finish “an ordeal that has denied peace and closure” to them for nearly 20 years.
In an interview in April, Fernando Castro, certainly one of Mr. Castro’s sons, referred to as the district lawyer’s withdrawal “outrageous,” including that frequent postponements and reversals had been painful for his household. “This isn’t one thing I need to hold fascinated by,” he stated.
Mr. Ramirez developed a relationship in jail with a Baptist pastor named Dana Moore and requested that Mr. Moore be allowed to pray out loud with him and contact him within the execution chamber. The state denied his request, citing safety considerations. The case made it to the Supreme Courtroom, which dominated, 8-1, in Mr. Ramirez’s favor in March.
Writing for almost all, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote that “there’s a wealthy historical past of clerical prayer on the time of a prisoner’s execution, relationship again effectively earlier than the founding of our nation.”
Mr. Ramirez’s final choice for avoiding execution is that if the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles grants him clemency. Mr. Ramirez’s lawyer, Seth Kretzer, stated on Thursday that “the probabilities are usually not precisely good,” and that he was now making ready for Mr. Ramirez to obtain a “constitutionally applicable execution” that included his pastor subsequent month.