Arizona presidential election: Trump campaign drops lawsuit demanding a review of ballots

The Trump campaign filed the lawsuit on Saturday alleging some voters had been confused on Election Day and feared that their ballots weren’t counted if the vote tabulation machines categorized their ballots as overvotes. They had been in search of a hand review of any ballots flagged by the machine as overvotes alleging it may lead to 1000’s of votes for President Donald Trump.

“As we’ve said, the Trump campaign’s lawsuit was frivolous and their motion to withdraw any claims of relief related to the presidential campaign confirms that this was nothing more than a waste of time,” the Biden campaign mentioned in a assertion. “President-Elect Joe Biden won Arizona, and now it’s time to unite the country and move forward.”

A state decide in Maricopa County, dwelling to Phoenix, held a six-hour evidentiary listening to Thursday.

“Since the close of yesterday’s hearing, the tabulation of votes statewide has rendered unnecessary a judicial ruling as to the presidential electors,” wrote Kory Langhofer, a lawyer for the Trump campaign. He mentioned he did need the decide to rule on their requests to review votes for 2 down-ballot races.

Lawyers for Maricopa County and Secretary of State filed papers on Friday noting that the distinction in votes between Biden and Trump is 11,414 with 10,315 ballots left to be counted. The county additionally mentioned there have been 191 votes categorized as overvotes within the presidential race, a quantity they mentioned was “consistent” with earlier contests.

The newest poll counts “moots” the Trump campaign’s declare, they wrote.

The Trump campaign had initially sought a review of all overvotes, however on Thursday, Langhofer revised his request, telling the decide that he would solely search a review of vote counts if the quantity of so-called overvotes exceeded the margin of victory.

Earlier, the decide threw out paper and digital affidavits the Trump campaign collected from voters after Langhofer acknowledged that some of the types had been “spam” and never official voters.

“Let me just clarify,” Judge Daniel Kiley mentioned to the Trump legal professional. “Your solicitation of witnesses yielded some sworn affidavits that you yourself clearly determined are false and spam, as you phrased it?”

“The ones that you couldn’t prove are false you submitted to the court?” the decide mentioned earlier than granting the county’s request to exclude the proof.

This story has been up to date with further particulars.

Source link

About The Author