Hours after writing to to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) director questioning the AIIMS report within the loss of life case of Sushant Singh Rajput, senior advocate Vikas Singh held a press convention on Wednesday requesting the Central Bureau of Investigation to look into the conduct of Dr. Sudhir Gupta, who headed the AIIMS panel that re-examined the actor’s loss of life.
Addressing the media, Singh mentioned, “The CBI should look into the conduct of the AIIMS team, they should examine who these doctors met and examine the statements that they have given in the media.”
“If it’s a suicide or not, it is not a question that shall not be answered by the doctors, it’s for the investigators to say,” Singh added, whereas elevating questions on the AIIMS opinion.
He added that within the report submitted by the crew to CBI there isn’t a dialogue on fractures and accidents, the viscera was so dry that it will have been troublesome to carry out something out of it.
“The AIIMS conduct is questionable, their doctors come to TV channels to share the opinion when the report is not shared in the public,” he mentioned whereas including that such statements by the crew of docs are in opposition to the Medical Council of India’s moral tips.
“Their work was to only give medico-legal opinion. They shouldn’t have given statements to the press. The CBI should also look into their conduct too,” mentioned Singh.
Singh added that Dr. Gupta shared an excellent rapport with him and when he had despatched him the images he had mentioned that it is 200% a case of strangulation and never suicide. He should not have given such free statements. The AIIMS did not have the physique of Sushant. They solely needed to give a opinion.
Earlier within the day, the authorized crew representing the family of the late actor wrote to CBI Director Rishi Kumar Shukla claiming that the forensic examination performed by the AIIMS board is defective.
In a letter addressed to the CBI Director, the authorized crew represented by Varun Singh mentioned, “I have been reading in the media about the report submitted by AIIMS to CBI with regard to the opinion expressed by CBI in the matter of the death of Sushant Singh Rajput on the 14th June, 2020. I have also seen some doctors who were part of the AIIMS Team come on TV and make statements with regard to the forensic examination done by the team.”
The letter additional mentioned that, “In spite of several efforts to get a copy of the Report, there has been no response by Dr. Sudhir Gupta and I am accordingly writing this letter on the premise that the news report regarding the AIIMS opinion is correct.
“The leaked report, if right, quantities to drawing a biased and boastful conclusion from inadequate proof,” the legal team said.
The legal team while raising questions on the said report said that AIIMS was not doing a post-mortem report but was only to express its opinion with regard to the post-mortem report done by the Cooper Hospital as AIIMS did not have the privilege of examining the body of Sushant Singh Rajput and thus forming a firsthand opinion about the cause of death.
The AIIMS panel in its report questioned the absence of the timing of death in the autopsy report and pointed towards the dimly-lit post mortem room at Cooper Hospital, sources said.
The source ruled out the poisoning angle in the death of the late actor. The source said that in the conclusive report submitted with the agency, doctors have pointed out towards the dim lighting in the post mortem room of Cooper Hospital.
Sushant’s autopsy was carried out by three doctors of Cooper Hospital on the night of June 14.
A team of AIIMS’ Forensic department was roped in by the CBI to give medico-legal opinion into the death of Sushant.
Sushant was found dead at his apartment on June 14.