Federal judge rejects GOP-led challenge seeking to invalidate nearly 127,000 votes in Democratic-leaning county


The lawsuit is a significant last-minute challenge to voting guidelines in intently watched states forward of the election, in which some officers have made particular lodging amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Throughout the listening to, Judge Andrew Hanen appeared to grapple with the concept that nearly 127,000 individuals had already voted in the drive-thru polling facilities and whether or not, if he invalided the method, they might have the opportunity to vote on Election Day.

“A lot of people would say, ‘Gee, if I had known there was a question about voting drive-in, I would have parked my car and walked to the polls,'” Hanen mentioned.

At one level, nevertheless, Hanen raised the query of whether or not drive-thru voting could be permissible on Election Day. Hanen mentioned, whereas holding up a guide, “I’m looking at the statute. It says on Election Day, they’re supposed to vote in a building.”

Monday, Christina Ford, an legal professional representing Democratic events that intervened in the case, mentioned that provisional ballots wouldn’t have a test field on them to mirror that the voter had forged a poll at a drive-thru location and that if a voter is discovered to have intent to vote twice it’s a prison offense.

Judge rejects Republican efforts to halt early vote counting in Las Vegas

Voters relied on county officers, Ford mentioned, and invalidating their ballots would “cause mass confusion” and create a “frantic situation with voters trying to figure out if they could cast a provisional ballot.”

Sunday, the Texas state Supreme Court denied a similar petition on drive-thru ballots. Roughly 10% of the votes forged in individual throughout the early voting interval have been forged at these websites.

In a separate case in Nevada, a judge rejected a Republican lawsuit seeking to halt early counting in Clark County, which incorporates Las Vegas, over the stringency of signature-matching laptop software program and the way intently observers can watch votes being counted.

President Donald Trump and Republican officers have repeatedly made baseless claims of voter fraud and sought to forged doubt on measures together with voting by mail and the usage of dropboxes.

During the listening to, Democratic legal professional Ford mentioned GOP claims of fraud in Harris County are non-existent.

“Plaintiffs argue that drive-thru voting would result in fraud and corruption,” Ford added. “There’s no evidence of that.”

The listening to started at 10:30 a.m. CT, however public entry was restricted in the beginning.

Reporters and different members of the general public have been granted entry to a teleconference about an hour after the listening to started. A cellphone line that had been arrange for entry broke down because the listening to was about to start. Reporters contained in the courthouse have been held in the foyer and never allowed into the courtroom due to social distancing measures put in place due to the coronavirus pandemic.

About 90 minutes after the listening to started, these reporters have been finally allowed into the courtroom.

Texas Supreme Court denies GOP-led petition seeking to invalidate nearly 127,000 votes in Houston area

Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor on the University of Texas School of Law, mentioned the lawsuit suits a broader sample of GOP-led lawsuits claiming voter fraud.

“Like so many 11th-hour voting-related suits filed by Republicans in recent weeks, this suit has almost nothing to do with voter fraud,” Vladeck, who has intervned on behalf of the defendants, wrote in an op-ed revealed in The Washington Post.

“Rather, it’s the latest in a consistent and cynical line of suits — in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, among others — that appear motivated by partisan gain, assuming that the exclusion of any set of ballots from Harris County … is good for Republicans.”

Judge is not any stranger to controversy

Hanen was appointed to the bench in 2002 by then-President George W. Bush and now serves in the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas, which sits in Harris County, the state’s most populous county and a Democratic stronghold.

Hanen is not any stranger to controversy. Back in 2016 he blocked President Barack Obama’s push to increase the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in addition to one other program aimed toward mother and father of authorized immigrants. At one level as part of that litigation, he was infuriated by actions taken by legal professionals on the Department of Justice, inflicting him to problem a 29-page order that started by quoting a scene in the film “Bridge of Spies.”
Hanen additionally quoted from “Miracle on 34th Street” earlier than concluding by ordering the attorneys who appeared in plaintiff states to go through a legal ethics course.

The case 10 drive-thru voting areas Harris County arrange for early voting, which ended Friday, and Election Day. The 10 areas are linked to conventional polling areas.

While curbside voting in Harris County is restricted to voters with a incapacity and situated in any respect polling websites, the drive-thru voting areas are open to all voters.

The federal challenge argues that drive-thru voting violates the US Constitution, which says state legislatures resolve how elections are run. The plaintiffs additionally argued it violates the equal safety clause of the 14th Amendment, in that the county is adopting a fashion of voting that has not been adopted by different Texas counties.

Jared Woodfill, a Houston lawyer representing the plaintiffs, argued that Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins was performing on his personal by implementing the observe of drive-thru voting, however Hollins has staunchly defended the observe of drive-thru voting, calling it a protected and authorized possibility amid the pandemic that is been repeatedly backed by the courts and election officers.

Before the listening to, Hollins instructed CNN’s Jim Sciutto on “Newsroom” Monday that ought to the nearly 127,000 ballots be invalidated, the county goes to use all obtainable sources to attain out to the voters impacted by the choice.

“We are prepared to marshal all county resources, including emergency response technology, to reach out to 127,000 of the potentially affected voters,” he mentioned. “We do have tomorrow, Election Day, and we’re going to do whatever we can to get them out there and make sure that their voices are heard and that their votes are counted.”

On Sunday, the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Texas, representing a number of individuals who used the drive-thru possibility in Harris County, filed a movement to intervene in the case on behalf of the county.

Joy Davis-Harasemay, a 44-year-old Houston voter who is likely one of the Texans named in the movement, has “both asthma and spondylitis, a degenerative spine disease that makes her unable to stand for long periods of time,” in accordance to the ACLU, which argued she could be disenfranchised if the votes are invalidated.

“The push to toss the ballots of nearly 127,000 Texans in Harris County is unconscionable and illegal,” Sophia Lin Lakin, the deputy director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, mentioned in a press release. “It appears to be an attempt to undermine a true and accurate vote count and improperly influence the outcome of the election.”

This story has been up to date with Hanen’s ruling and extra particulars.

CNN’s Ariane de Vogue, Ashley Killough, Ed Lavandera and Samira Said contributed to this report.



Source link

About The Author