External Affairs Ministry spokesman Anurag Srivastava briefed the press on June 25 on a variety of points. Here is the portion of the transcript of what he mentioned on current India-China border points:
In current days, now we have made our place clear on the unfolding developments within the Western Sector of India China Border areas. In specific, our statement of 20th June supplied the related information and clearly established it has been the Chinese actions to date which have led to extend in stress within the area and in addition to the violent face-off of 15th June with casualties.
In early May, the Chinese aspect had taken motion to hinder India’s regular, conventional patrolling sample within the Galwan Valley space. The ensuing face-off was addressed by the bottom commanders as per the provisions of the bilateral agreements and protocols. In mid-May, the Chinese aspect sought to alter the established order in different areas of the Western Sector. We had registered our protest on the Chinese actions by way of each the Diplomatic and Military channels, and made it clear that any such change was unacceptable to us. Subsequently, the Senior Commanders met on 6 June 2020 and agreed on a course of for de-escalation and disengagement alongside the LAC that concerned reciprocal actions. Both sides had agreed to respect and abide by the LAC and never undertake any exercise to change the established order.
As I discussed in my statement on 20th June, the Chinese aspect departed from these understandings in respect of the LAC within the Galwan Valley space and sought to erect buildings simply throughout the LAC. When this try was foiled, Chinese troops took violent actions on 15 June 2020 that instantly resulted in casualties. Thereafter, either side stay deployed in giant numbers within the area, whereas army and diplomatic contacts are persevering with.
The incidents and face-offs alongside the LAC have to be understood within the bigger context of current developments. That additionally helps to deliver out the important thing points that either side are searching for to handle. At the guts of the matter is that since early May, the Chinese aspect has been amassing a big contingent of troops and armaments alongside the LAC. This shouldn’t be in accordance with the provisions of our varied bilateral agreements, particularly the important thing 1993 Agreement on the Maintenance of Peace and Tranquility alongside the Line of Actual Control within the India-China Border Areas. This notes specifically that ‘each side will keep its military forces in the areas along the line of actual control to a minimum level compatible with friendly and good neighbourly relations between the two countries’. Obviously, the Indian aspect needed to undertake counter deployments and the ensuing stress has thereafter expressed itself.
Respecting and strictly observing the Line of Actual Control is the premise for peace and tranquility within the border areas and explicitly acknowledged so within the 1993 and subsequent agreements. Indian troops are absolutely acquainted with the alignment of the LAC in all sectors of the India-China border areas and abide scrupulously by it. They have been patrolling all alongside the LAC, together with within the Galwan Valley, for a very long time. All infrastructure constructed by the Indian aspect has all the time been by itself aspect of the LAC. The Indian aspect has by no means undertaken any actions throughout the LAC and has by no means tried to unilaterally change the established order. However, that has not been reciprocated by the Chinese aspect and that sometimes has led to face-offs.
Over a few years, either side have developed patterns of patrolling and it’s cheap expectation that patrols is not going to be obstructed within the discharge of their reputable duties. Unfortunately, now we have skilled within the final a few years obstruction to patrolling that always accompany efforts to unilaterally change the established order. To present for conditions the place the 2 sides encounter one another, a set of procedures and norms have been mutually agreed upon. These are mirrored in a quantity of agreements and understandings. While there have been occasional departures previously, the conduct of Chinese forces this 12 months has been in full disregard of all mutually agreed norms.
Also learn | China demands India’s withdrawal from Galwan Valley
The deployment of giant physique of troops and adjustments in conduct has additionally been aggravated by unjustified and untenable claims. The current shift within the Chinese place on the Galwan Valley is one instance.
The upkeep of peace and tranquility within the border areas is the premise of our bilateral relationship. It is crucial that the established mechanisms are utilized by each events to handle the present scenario. The assembly of the Working Mechanism for Consultation & Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC) yesterday was, due to this fact, a big improvement. It was preceded by a dialogue amongst senior army commanders on 22 June that centered on implementation¬¬ of the understandings reached between them on 6 June 2020.
You are additionally conscious that the Foreign Ministers of the 2 nations had a dialog on 17 June 2020 and had agreed that the general scenario could be dealt with in a accountable method, and that the disengagement understanding of 6 June could be applied.
Also learn | Destroyed Chinese post back in Galwan Valley
We anticipate that the Chinese aspect to sincerely comply with up on this understanding and make sure the expeditious restoration of peace and tranquility within the border areas. A continuation of the present scenario would solely vitiate the environment for the event of the connection.