Richard Pilger, director of the elections crimes department within the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section, instructed colleagues in an e mail that the legal professional normal was issuing “an important new policy abrogating the forty-year-old Non-Interference Policy for ballot fraud investigations in the period prior to elections becoming certified and uncontested.” Pilger additionally forwarded the memo to colleagues in his resignation letter.
Pilger will stay a prosecutor within the Justice unit that investigates public corruption.
Barr did not present any indication that the Justice Department has give you proof to help Trump’s declare of large fraud in final week’s election.
In his memo, Barr notes that whereas “most allegations of purported election misconduct are of such a scale that they would not impact the outcome of an election and, thus, investigation can appropriately be deferred, that is not always the case.”
“Furthermore, any concerns that overt actions taken by the Department could inadvertently impact an election are greatly minimized, if they exist at all, once voting has concluded, even if election certification has not yet been completed,” he wrote.
The legal professional normal has beforehand been supportive of Trump’s unfounded claims about voter fraud, and this newest transfer comes throughout an extremely tense time and will inflame an already fraught transition. President-elect Joe Biden is starting his transition into workplace whereas Trump and his administration refuse to acknowledge the previous vp’s victory, making baseless claims about voter fraud and unlawful votes that threaten to undermine the bedrock of American authorities.
Barr’s letter to felony prosecutors broke a days-long silence that has been awkward as Trump and his marketing campaign legal professionals have held information conferences and filed lawsuits which were devoid of any proof of widespread fraud. Trump claims voting irregularities clarify why he’s behind in states he would want to win reelection and has refused to concede defeat to President-elect Joe Biden.
The memo got here after weeks of inside discussions amongst Justice officers, throughout which senior officers instructed Barr altering the coverage on fraud investigations can be a foul concept, in response to an individual briefed on the discussions. Barr issued the memo Monday to the shock of senior officers, together with Pilger, the particular person briefed on the matter mentioned.
A Justice official mentioned nobody requested or directed Barr to concern his memo.
The goal of the memo is unclear, since prosecutors already know their tasks to analyze vote fraud and different irregularities. But it may serve to offer the President some indication that Barr and the Justice Department are working to search out the proof that Trump and his marketing campaign up to now have not produced.
Barr instructed prosecutors in his Monday memo: “I authorize you to pursue substantial allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities prior to the certification of elections in your jurisdictions in certain cases, as I have already done in specific instances.”
“While serious allegations of voter fraud should be handled with great care, specious, speculative, fanciful or far-fetched claims should not be a basis for initiating federal inquiries,” Barr wrote.
Barr has been described by some Justice officers as obsessive about the thought of voter fraud in current weeks. He has repeatedly inquired about efforts by prosecutors to search for indicators of fraud, Justice officers say. He additionally requested about the potential for sending federal officers to polling stations, although he was suggested that federal legislation prohibited sending armed federal officers to protect the polls.
Pilger has spent 17 years as a profession public corruption prosecutor. Conservative critics attacked him in the course of the Obama administration for having conferences with Lois Lerner, an IRS official who scrutinized Tea Party and different conservative teams that sought tax-exempt standing. But he’s additionally one of many profession prosecutors who final 12 months helped decide that Trump did not violate marketing campaign finance legislation when he pressed the Ukrainian president in a 2019 cellphone name to analyze then-candidate Biden, sources briefed on the matter mentioned.
This story and its headline have been up to date with extra developments.