Sushant Singh Rajput case: CBI team in Mumbai again to collect more evidence


Sushant Singh Rajput case: CBI team in Mumbai again to collect more evidence 

Shortly after the members of the family of late Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput wrote to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) demanding the reconstitution of a medical team, the federal company sleuths had been as soon as again in Mumbai.

A CBI supply mentioned that the investigation into Sushant’s dying continues to be persevering with and all of the points are being regarded into “meticulously”.

“As per the demand of the investigation, either a team or a set of officers visit Mumbai at regular intervals, besides the agency officers from the Mumbai branch present there,” the supply added.

The supply, nonetheless, refused to share the title of the officers of the company who arrived in Mumbai from Delhi.

The supply mentioned that the CBI sleuths reached Mumbai to collect more particulars in the case.

The remarks got here after Varun Singh, son of Sushant’s lawyer Vikas Singh, wrote to CBI chief R.Ok. Shukla after the Bombay High Court granted bail to Sushant’s girlfriend Rhea Chakraborty, late actor’s home supervisor Samuel Miranda and private workers Dipesh Sawant in a narcotics associated case.

Rhea was arrested on September eight after three days of questioning. However, the excessive court docket denied bail to her brother Showik.

Varun Singh, in his letter to the CBI chief, referred to the report of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) rejecting the opportunity of homicide and claimed that the forensic examination performed by the forensic board is defective.

“I have been reading in the media about the report submitted by AIIMS to CBI with regard to the opinion expressed by CBI in the matter of the death of Sushant Singh Rajput on June 14, 2020. I have also seen some doctors who were part of the AIIMS team come on TV and make statements with regard to the forensic examination done by the team,” he mentioned.

The letter mentioned that in spite of a number of efforts to get a duplicate of the report, there was no response by AIIMS forensic board head Dr Sudhir Gupta and “I am accordingly writing this letter on the premise that the news report regarding the AIIMS opinion is correct”.

The leaked forensic report, if right, quantities to drawing a biased and boastful conclusion from inadequate evidence, Varun Singh mentioned.

The CBI registered a case on August 6 on the suggestions of the Centre. Sushant was discovered lifeless on June 14 in his Bandra flat.

The CBI team had reached Mumbai on August 20, a day after the Supreme Court gave its nod for the federal company probe.

The AIIMS forensic team additionally visited Mumbai and recreated the crime scene at Sushant’s condo and recorded the assertion of a number of individuals.

The Narcotics Control Bureau, nonetheless, registered a case after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) probing the cash laundering angle into Sushant’s case discovered alleged drug chats.

Jaikush Hoon, a legal lawyer commenting on the bail to Rhea, Miranda and Sawant by the High Court, mentioned that the NCB has failed to construct its case towards the three below sections 27(a), 22(c), 22(b), 20 (b)(c) of the NDPS Act,1985.

“In my opinion, the mastermind is out on bail now. It is a big setback to NCB and Sushant case as well. The agency was after a drug syndicate of 1.35 lakh crore in the country and this order would come as a relief to lot of people who are active or facilitating member of the crime syndicate,” he mentioned.

He mentioned tampering with evidence and influencing of witnesses might be on the playing cards.

Fight against Coronavirus: Full coverage

Source link

About The Author